home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cs.utexas.edu!academ!tcac!usenet
- From: ddeen@tcac.com (Duane Deen)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,alt.comp.hardware
- Subject: Re: CARDINAL Modems SUCK!
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 14:08:28 GMT
- Organization: TCA Communications of Texas
- Message-ID: <4gf90m$gl4@jupiter.tcac.com>
- References: <3124D1D0.16D7@a.crl.com> <4g2qh5$d8g@artemis.it.luc.edu> <31259572.2BE3@donuts.com> <4g4v1f$5dm@darwin.nbnet.nb.ca> <31275e7c.13192236@nntp5.mindspring.com> <4gcl0o$73t@shore.shore.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: lfkn-ara1-a5.tcac.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- wetboy@shore.net (wetboy) wrote:
-
- >Phil Haseltine (philh@mindspring.com) wrote:
- >: Andrew Trevors <virtual1@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
-
- >: >dunkin@donuts.com wrote:
- >: >>I have to agree with the point that cardinal modems suck... I also
-
- >I have a Cardinal MVP288I, and have used it exclusively for 6 months
- >with no problems at all. 28800 bit/sec connections almost always, since
- >I switched ISPs.
-
- While some of the Cardinal modems in the past were not the best, the
- newer modems are very good. I also have a MVP288I and it is a fine
- modem. I get 28800 connections almost always with my ISP and I just
- upgraded to Win95 and it found and installed my modem with no problem.
-
-
-